Test Code TPPA Syphilis Antibody, Treponema pallidum Particle Agglutination, Serum
Reporting Name
Syphilis Ab by TP-PA, SUseful For
An aid to resolve discrepant results between screening treponemal and non-treponemal assays
This test is not recommended for general screening purposes for syphilis.
This test should not be used to evaluate response to therapy.
This test is not intended for medical-legal use.
Testing Algorithm
For more information see Syphilis Serology Algorithm.
Performing Laboratory
Mayo Clinic Laboratories in RochesterSpecimen Type
SerumOrdering Guidance
This assay is recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for sera testing positive by a screening treponemal assay and negative by rapid plasma reagin (RPR). The results of this assay assist in determining whether the results of a screening treponemal test are truly or falsely positive.
Specimen Required
Collection Container/Tube:
Preferred: Serum gel
Acceptable: Red top
Submission Container/Tube: Plastic vial
Specimen Volume: 0.5 mL
Collection Instructions: Centrifuge and aliquot serum into a plastic vial.
Specimen Minimum Volume
0.3 mL
Specimen Stability Information
Specimen Type | Temperature | Time | Special Container |
---|---|---|---|
Serum | Refrigerated (preferred) | 14 days | |
Frozen | 14 days |
Reference Values
Negative
Day(s) Performed
Monday through Friday
Test Classification
This test has been cleared, approved, or is exempt by the US Food and Drug Administration and is used per manufacturer's instructions. Performance characteristics were verified by Mayo Clinic in a manner consistent with CLIA requirements.CPT Code Information
86780
LOINC Code Information
Test ID | Test Order Name | Order LOINC Value |
---|---|---|
TPPA | Syphilis Ab by TP-PA, S | 24312-1 |
Result ID | Test Result Name | Result LOINC Value |
---|---|---|
61480 | Syphilis Ab by TP-PA, S | 24312-1 |
Special Instructions
Clinical Information
Syphilis is a disease caused by infection with the spirochete Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum. The infection is systemic, and the disease is characterized by periods of latency. These features, together with the fact that T pallidum cannot be isolated in culture, mean that serologic techniques play a major role in the diagnosis and follow-up of treatment for syphilis.
Syphilis is categorized by an early primary infection in which patients may have nonspecific symptoms and, potentially, genital lesions. Patients tested by serology during the primary phase may be negative for antibodies, especially if testing is performed during the first 1 to 2 weeks after symptom onset. As the disease progresses into the secondary phase, antibodies to T pallidum reach peak titers and may persist indefinitely regardless of the disease state or prior therapy. Therefore, detection of antibodies to nontreponemal antigens, such as cardiolipin (a lipoidal antigen released by host cells damaged by T pallidum) may help to differentiate between active and past syphilis infection. Non-treponemal antibodies are detected by the rapid plasma reagin (RPR) assay, which is typically positive during current infection and negative following treatment or during late/latent forms of syphilis.
For prenatal syphilis screening, the syphilis IgG test (SYPH1 / Syphilis IgG with Reflex, Enzyme Immunoassay, Serum) is recommended. Testing for IgM-class antibodies to T pallidum should not be performed during routine pregnancy screening.
Historically, the serologic testing algorithm for syphilis included an initial nontreponemal screening test, such as the RPR or VDRL tests. Because these tests measure the host's antibody response to nontreponemal antigens, they may lack specificity. Therefore, a positive result by RPR or VDRL requires confirmation by a treponemal-specific test, such as the T pallidum particle agglutination (TP-PA) assay. Although technically simple to perform, the TP-PA assay is labor intensive and requires subjective interpretation by testing personnel.
Due to the increased specificity of treponemal assays and the objective result interpretation of automated treponemal immunoassays, many large clinical laboratories have switched to screening for syphilis using a reverse algorithm. Per this algorithm, serum samples are first tested by an automated treponemal immunoassay, and positive samples are reflexed to the RPR assay to provide an indication of the patient's disease state and history of treatment. For specimens testing positive by the screening treponemal assay and negative by RPR, a second treponemal test (eg, TP-PA) is performed. The results of TP-PA assist in determining whether the results of a screening treponemal test are truly or falsely positive.
Interpretation
Syphilis screening at Mayo Clinic is performed by using the reverse algorithm, which first tests sera for Treponema pallidum specific IgG antibodies using an automated immunoassay. Antibodies to syphilis can remain elevated despite appropriate antimicrobial treatment and a reactive result does not distinguish between recent or past infection. To further evaluate disease and treatment status, samples that are reactive by the syphilis screening test are reflexed to the rapid plasma reagin (RPR) assay, which detects antibodies to cardiolipin, a lipoidal antigen released from host cells damaged by T pallidum. Unlike treponemal-specific antibodies, RPR titers decrease and usually become undetectable following appropriate treatment and can be used to monitor response to therapy.
In some patients, the results of the treponemal screening test and RPR may be discordant (eg, syphilis IgG positive and RPR negative). To discriminate between a falsely reactive screening result and past syphilis, a second treponemal-specific antibody test is recommended using a method that is different from the initial screening test (eg, T pallidum particle agglutination: TP-PA).
In the setting of a positive syphilis IgG screening result and a negative RPR, a positive TP-PA result is consistent with one of the following:
1. Past, successfully treated syphilis
2. Early syphilis with undetectable RPR titers
3. Late/latent syphilis in patients who do not have a history of treatment for syphilis
Further historical evaluation is necessary to distinguish between these scenarios (Table).
In the setting of a positive syphilis IgG screening result and a negative RPR, a negative TP-PA result is most consistent with a falsely reactive syphilis IgG screen (Table). If syphilis remains clinically suspected, a second specimen should be submitted, order SYPH1 / Syphilis IgG with Reflex, Enzyme Immunoassay, Serum.
Table. Interpretation and follow-up of reverse screening results
Patient history |
Test and result |
Interpretation |
Follow-up |
||
EIA/CIA/MFI |
RPR |
TP-PA |
|||
Unknown history of syphilis |
Nonreactive |
N/A |
N/A |
No serologic evidence of syphilis |
None, unless clinically indicated (eg, early/acute/ primary syphilis) |
Unknown history of syphilis |
Reactive |
Reactive |
N/A |
Untreated or recently treated syphilis |
See Centers for Disease Control and Prevention treatment guidelines  |
Unknown history of syphilis |
Reactive |
Nonreactive |
Nonreactive |
Probable false-positive screening test |
No follow-up testing, unless clinically indicated (eg, acute/primary syphilis) |
Unknown history of syphilis |
Reactive |
Nonreactive |
Reactive |
Possible syphilis (eg, early or latent) or previously treated syphilis |
Historical and clinical evaluation required |
Known history of syphilis |
Reactive |
Nonreactive |
Reactive or N/A |
Past, successfully treated syphilis |
None |
CIA, chemiluminescence immunoassay; EIA, enzyme immunoassay; N/A, not applicable; RPR, rapid plasma reagin; TP-PA, Treponema pallidum particle agglutination.
Report Available
Same day/1 to 4 daysSpecimen Retention Time
14 daysReject Due To
Gross hemolysis | Reject |
Gross lipemia | Reject |
Method Name
Particle Agglutination
Forms
If not ordering electronically, complete, print, and send Infectious Disease Serology Test Request (T916) with the specimen.